Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:37

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
How does gut health affect mental well-being?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Fruits and Veggies Boost Sleep Quality - Neuroscience News
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Alex Cora Takes Blame for Red Sox Woes After Extra Innings Loss - Sports Illustrated
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sarah Michelle Gellar Wants to 'Bring Back Everyone' in the New Buffy - Variety
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Vienna calling: Strauss's 'Blue Danube' waltzes into outer space - Phys.org
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.